Azeen Ghorayshi mentioned the trans identity of WPATH President Marci Bowers, but did not include the identities of people mentioned in the story who were cis.

A response highlighted the lack of expertise involved in the Cass Review, the lack of evidence for many of the claims, and the lack of any new information that might change the picture of gender-affirming care.

Publisher of the absolute nothingburger “WPATH files,” Michael Shellenberger, was briefly duped into thinking the trans healthcare organization had deposed its leader and undone its most recent guidelines… and Jesse Singal was somehow the voice of reason?!

Assigned Media analyzed hundreds of forum posts by WPATH members under a microscope. We found that WPATH members created hundreds of boring forum posts.

Doctors serving the trans community are damned if they do, damned if they don’t as the normal process of weighing the risks and benefits of a procedure are twisted by the far right.

WPATH is often criticized by trans people for its medicalized, cautious approach to setting standards for gender affirming care, but their response to the new conversion-therapy tinged NHS guidelines is careful, methodical, scientifically sound, and an absolute banger.

The body resposible for setting guidelines for gender affirming care labeled the NYT piece “misinformation.”

Gender critical author Lisa Selin Davis wrapped a misleading critique of WPATH around a comically large advertisement for her book.